---
description: "Phase 2 supply chain assessment protocol with the 27 combined capabilities inventory for SSSC Planner."
applyTo: '**/.copilot-tracking/sssc-plans/**'
---
# SSSC Phase 2 — Supply Chain Assessment
Assess the target repository's current supply chain security posture against the combined capabilities inventory from hve-core and physical-ai-toolchain.
## 27 Combined Capabilities Inventory
### hve-core Unique (6)
| # | Capability | Implementation |
|---|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1 | pip-audit | pip-audit.yml reusable workflow for Python dependency vulnerability scanning |
| 2 | Action version consistency | Test-ActionVersionConsistency.ps1 validates all workflow references use consistent versions |
| 3 | Automated SHA pinning updates | Update-ActionSHAPinning.ps1 automates SHA pin refresh when actions publish new versions |
| 4 | Consolidated weekly security summary | Aggregated reporting across all security scan results |
| 5 | Get-VerifiedDownload.ps1 | Verified download utility with SHA-256 hash validation for external tool acquisition |
| 6 | Security workflow orchestration | Coordinated execution of multiple security scans with unified reporting |
### physical-ai-toolchain Unique (10)
| # | Capability | Implementation |
|----|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 7 | SBOM generation | anchore/sbom-action producing SPDX-JSON output per release |
| 8 | Sigstore signing | gitsign-based keyless signing for release tags and commits |
| 9 | DAST/ZAP | Dynamic application security testing via OWASP ZAP |
| 10 | Dual attestation | Build provenance and SBOM attestation via actions/attest-build-provenance and actions/attest |
| 11 | Stale docs → issue | Automated issue creation when documentation drifts from code |
| 12 | OpenSSF Best Practices badge | Badge enrollment and criteria tracking in GOVERNANCE.md |
| 13 | Dependabot security prefix enrichment | Auto-retitle security Dependabot PRs with `security(deps):` prefix using GHSA/CVSS metadata |
| 14 | Comprehensive threat model | Structured threat model document with STRIDE analysis |
| 15 | release-please pipeline | Automated release management with conventional commits |
| 16 | Vulnerability SLA | Defined service-level agreements for vulnerability remediation timelines |
### Shared (11)
| # | Capability | Implementation |
|----|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 17 | Dependency pinning | dependency-pinning-scan.yml with Test-DependencyPinning.ps1 |
| 18 | SHA staleness | SHA staleness checks validating pinned action references are current |
| 19 | gitleaks | Secret scanning via gitleaks in CI pipelines |
| 20 | CodeQL | GitHub Code Scanning with CodeQL for SAST |
| 21 | Dependency review | dependency-review.yml for PR-time dependency change analysis |
| 22 | OpenSSF Scorecard | Scorecard scanning for supply chain security posture |
| 23 | Workflow permissions | Test-WorkflowPermissions.ps1 enforcing least-privilege token permissions |
| 24 | Copyright headers | Automated copyright header validation across source files |
| 25 | Dependabot | Dependabot configuration for automated dependency updates |
| 26 | SECURITY.md | Security policy document with vulnerability reporting process |
| 27 | CODEOWNERS | Code ownership enforcement for required reviews |
## Assessment Protocol
For each of the 27 capabilities, evaluate the target repository:
1. **Detect**: Search the repository for evidence of the capability (workflow files, scripts, configuration, documentation).
2. **Classify**: Assign a coverage status:
* ✅ **Covered** — capability is implemented and active
* ⚠️ **Partial** — capability exists but is incomplete or misconfigured
* ❌ **Gap** — capability is absent
* ➖ **N/A** — capability does not apply to this repository's technology stack
3. **Document**: Record evidence (file paths, workflow names, configuration details) for each assessment.
4. **Verify**: For ✅ and ⚠️ items, confirm the implementation matches the reference patterns from hve-core or physical-ai-toolchain.
Ask the user to confirm or correct assessment findings in batches of 5-7 capabilities per turn.
## Output
Write the assessment to `.copilot-tracking/sssc-plans/{project-slug}/supply-chain-assessment.md`.
Structure the output as:
```markdown
# Supply Chain Assessment — {project-slug}
## Summary
- Covered: {count}/27
- Partial: {count}/27
- Gap: {count}/27
- N/A: {count}/27
## Detailed Assessment
### hve-core Unique Capabilities
{per-capability assessment}
### physical-ai-toolchain Unique Capabilities
{per-capability assessment}
### Shared Capabilities
{per-capability assessment}
```
Update `state.json`:
* Set `phases.2-assessment.status` to `✅`
* Add `supply-chain-assessment.md` to `phases.2-assessment.artifacts`
* Advance `currentPhase` to `3`microsoft/hve-core
Publicmirrored from https://github.com/microsoft/hve-coreAvailable
.github/instructions/security/sssc-assessment.instructions.md
99lines · modepreview